Tuesday, May 27, 2014

AFS 2010 BLOG #2


Saundra Wells

AFS 2010

Blog #2

 

African Elements in African American English/ Questions Africanisms in African American Names

 

Although Africans were forced to come to America to serve the inadequacy of the early settlers, the traditions instilled within them from their country was not erased from their minds or souls. They were not allowed to practice traditional rituals and or ceremonies that they were accustomed to, they still found ways to communicate and be in touch with their roots. In chapter 3 the author Asante critiques the earlier scholars like Melville Herskovits, Janheinz Jahn not because of the methods they utilized to explain about the African language bit for the interference caused by their methods. The opinion of author Asante was that the African language was misinterpreted because the knowledge of earlier scholars was thorough enough to conclude that the language that Africans spoke here in America was understood enough to the conclusion that they (Africans) were not speaking English.

The misunderstanding of the Gullah language by white American linguists was proved by the study of the language in comparison to their African origin. In chapter 3 Asante highlights the findings of American Linguist Ambrose Gonzales as misunderstanding the Gullah language in his citing that the words spoken by Africans were English words perhaps mispronounced or spelled wrong. These words indeed were of African origin, Gonzales was not familiar with the African language. These findings were pointed out by linguist Lorenzo Turner, who believed after extensive studies of the African language compared to the English language was similar due to Africans not forgetting their roots or cultural in which they were born in. The belief that “no displaced people have ever completely lost the firms of their previous culture”. The basics of speech from the African culture was intertwined with the new world and language they were forced to live in, and with that alterations were made in order to survive.

Although earlier writers preferred African verbal communication in African American language, the communication style is clearly up to the individual and thus verbal expressions may vary. The development of Ebonics was believed to be one’s stress of the past tense verbs. In the videos for instance code switching the verbalizations were noted to be switched as to how you speak with family at home and how your language is changed when you speak out in the public. The idea that the language is modified for many African Americans being what is described a cultural thing. The belief that in order to be taken seriously you would need to adapt to speak properly in a professional atmosphere as opposed to speaking “slang” with your friends, which sometimes is not acceptable in certain social situations. This was in coordination with the adjustment of the atmosphere in which you find yourself in. The slaves found themselves in a new world and changes forced upon them, for example their names were changed primarily because their names given to them in their culture could not be pronounced. The modification of one’s speaking has had history over many decades, the changing of the way a person communicates at one time was “Ebonics” in the 70’s, then “black English” then “African American vernacular English”. In the AA English the topic of Ebonics was one that was analyzed as to who actually taught blacks how to speak from the beginning, this was in conjunction with author Asante statement of how we as blacks modified language of our ancestors and present day blacks. The video Ink spot viewed that the speaking of proper English viewed an African American as speaking like you are white. The influence of Ebonics and or AAV English has had impact on the African American speaking patterns today, just as Asante reflected that the language we speak depends on the area in which we are in. We again tend to modify our language to adapt to the situations we find ourselves in.

In chapter 4 the naming practices of in the African culture was one that had meaning for example: the Africans who arrived in Colonial America especially in the deep South continued to give their children African names, giving the child a sense of their ancestry roots and maintaining their cultural integrity a well as a link to their African roots. The naming of African children was a traditional process, one that appeared to be a simple process, for example a child rather they are male or female was named after the day of the week they were born. The names that were given eventually was translated in to the English language. For example a female child born on a Friday was named “Phibba” which translated into English as Phoebe.

The process of giving a name to a child was of great importance because it was believed that the child’s personality was a result of the name that was given to them at birth. This itself takes a lot of thinking and analyzing of a person to choose the right name to identify how they turn out in life.

The terms on page 93-105 I found to be interesting because of the usage in our language today, for example the term bad-mouth is still used today especially among older adults meaning someone that is not speaking nicely. The term biddy is a word still used to day to describe a small child or very small adult for the most part it is used today as a description of a female. Again the word chick is still synonymous with today’s language, it used to describe a female when a person is speaking slang in today’s language. So the languages that was utilized in our ancestors  native land was thoroughly intertwined with the English language, and with that being said I believe that African Americans are superior as to the development of this country.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

AFS 2010

BLOG #1

Saundra Wells

 
Melville Herskovits a Jewish sociologist whose studies of the African American culture initially believed in the idea that African Americans retained their instilled cultural practices. This idea differed from that of his colleague E. Franklin Frazier that African Americans had lost part if not all of their cultural practices during slavery, because of the oppressive experience during their time of captivity. This may have been a forethought because of the in human treatment of African Americans extended to them in slavery, including the practice of not letting the captured individuals practice any of their homeland rituals.

 The parallel of both Lorenzo Turner and Melville Herskovits lives was significant even from the beginning their educational goals as well as their interest in Africa starting in 1930 was substantial. Both adopted the African retention theory and held it as the center of their studies in the African American culture. Although both were scholars of the African American culture the only division was that Turner explored his theory as a linguist and Herskovits developed his views as an anthropologist. Both scholars was very much interested in African retentions in the new world.

Early theories on the African culture focused on many ways of grasping a set way of understanding how this diversified group functioned. The theories of African people and that of African American was connected through music, folklore, art, speech and religion.

The scholars discussed in the video as well as in the readings for this assignment was Lorenzo Turner whose theory was that of language. He was Linguist who studied data and many languages utilized by African Americans from different areas in Africa. Turner studied the language of the Gullah people of West Africa with the idea that his theory of language would be supported.

Herskovits an anthropologist, whose theory was that African Americans were indeed not influenced by their African Ancestors, but that African Americans utilized the culture of the Europeans who forcefully removed them from Africa.  Herskovits theory of “African Americanism” was not supported by the cultural patterns that paralleled Africa to blacks in Harlem an area in which he felt represented a cross section of the black life. His theory as it was set began to change after experiences during his travels which included Dominica, St. Kitts, St. Lucia and Barbados. During these travels he was able to view that something as a simple as a game or dance portrayed cultural roots to their African Ancestors in their original culture.

Sociologist Frazier’s theory was one that once Africans were brought to the United States-they dismissed all of their African cultural practices.

The article highlighted the participation of African Americans in the war. The migration from the “Garvey Movement” created false pride of Nationalism. Although during this time the interest of blacks on learning more about their heritage and history. The development of the NAACP had the attention of many authors of European descent implanting and interest in African American communities throughout the country. The presence of racial issues aided in the development of the African American culture. One primary influence was the “Harlem Renaissance”, which was discussed in the documentary as well as in the article. The Harlem Renaissance can be very well identified as a display of African Americans coming to their identities. African art, music and writings thrived in Harlem. Herskovits witnessed this development-he was at Columbia University at the time.

The educational achievement of both Turner and Herskovits inspires me. It is my goal to study “cultures” to help me satisfy my curiosity as to how they developed. My academic goals I have set for myself include obtaining a PhD in Sociology. I would also one day want to be able to be a teacher of the African American Culture.
No comments: